PETER OBI, ALEX OTTI & NENADE USMAN LOST AS SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS JULIUS ABURE AS LP CHAIRMAN

 

SUPREME COURT DELIVERS VERDICT WITH JULIUS ABURE TO REMAIN NATIONAL CHAIRMAN
WHILE PETER OBI, ALEX OTTI, NENADE USMAN & OTHERS LOSE OUT PAINFULLY

Usman Umar Reporting from Abuja Live...

The Supreme Court has delivered a landmark judgment in the ongoing leadership crisis within the Labour Party, upholding Julius Abure as the National Chairman.

The court's decision, delivered on April 4, 2025, emphasizes that the leadership of a political party is an internal affair, and courts have no jurisdiction over such matters.

Key Points from the Judgment:

- Internal Affairs: The Supreme Court ruled that the Labour Party's leadership crisis is an internal matter, and courts should not interfere.

- Abure's Position: The court upheld Abure's position as National Chairman, stating that his tenure has not been affected by any court ruling.

- Party Leadership: The National Working Committee, led by Abure, remains the recognized leadership of the party.

- INEC Recognition: The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) recognizes the leadership that emerged from the party's national convention on March 27, 2024.

Reactions from the Labour Party:

The Labour Party has welcomed the judgment, with the National Publicity Secretary, Obiora Ifoh, stating that the party is satisfied with the verdict.

The party has called on its members to abide by the judgment and respect the party's constitution.

Implications of the Ruling:

The Supreme Court's decision has significant implications for the Labour Party's internal dynamics.

The ruling:

- Reinforces Party Autonomy: The judgment underscores the importance of party autonomy in resolving internal disputes.

- Ends Leadership Crisis: The ruling is expected to bring an end to the prolonged leadership crisis within the party.

- Sets Precedent: The judgment sets a precedent for other political parties, emphasizing the importance of internal decision-making processes.

In response to the judgment, the Labour Party's National Caretaker Committee has expressed gratitude to the Supreme Court, describing the verdict as a "monumental victory" for democracy.

The party has pledged to focus on rebuilding and advancing its governance agenda.

But we can still look at the issues from.other sides.

Let's look at it here:

The Labour Party's internal crisis seems to be ongoing, but the Supreme Court has weighed in on the matter.

Here's what's happening:

- Supreme Court Ruling: The court ruled on April 4, 2025, that the leadership of the Labour Party is an internal affair, and courts have no business interfering with it.

This means that the party's structures should decide its leaders, not the courts.

- Abure's Position: The ruling effectively upholds Julius Abure as the National Chairman of the Labour Party.

The court's decision didn't sack Abure but instead reaffirmed the preceding high court and appeal court judgments that support the party's internal decision-making process.

- Conflicting Claims: Despite the ruling, there's confusion, with both Abure and Nenadi Usman claiming victory.

Usman's camp sees the judgment as a victory for the rule of law, while Abure's camp believes the ruling solidifies his position as chairman.

- Party Leadership: The Labour Party's constitution outlines who the leaders are and how they're chosen.

The National Working Committee, led by Abure, is recognized as the party's leadership, and their national convention report is acknowledged by INEC.

- Implications: The ruling emphasizes that political parties should decide their leaders, not courts.

This means the Labour Party's internal mechanisms should resolve disputes, and members should respect the party's constitution.

The situation is complex, with different interpretations of the Supreme Court's ruling.

However, the court's decision seems to support the Labour Party's internal decision-making process and Abure's position as chairman.